“Let us not choose a career in thoughts of
personal advance, but choose a career based on talents and aptitude.” This is
the part of our school’s motto. I think my school, Korean Minjok Leadership
Academy, is doing a good job in terms of the ideal educational system that
Malcom Gladwell is dreaming of in his fourth episode, “Carlos Doesn’t
Remember.” Our school selects 150 talented and potential ones among the
students throughout the whole nation each year, provides them appropriate,
high-quality education which suits them in order to open a better future.
However, Malcom is also aware of those students who are as talented as the ones
who are recognized talented, but are not provided high-quality education due to
lacking advocates. He thinks that our educational system has to play a better
job selecting gifted students from the very beginning. I totally agree with his
idea, but I have another point of view that people should also consider
seriously.
If more talented students get selected and
receive better education, what happens to all the other students who are “less
talented?” Some people might think there is nothing to worry about because “less
talented students” do not have any qualification for good quality education and
they are the ones who need to learn from the very basics. However, the reality
is that as the interest in education is excessively concentrated to smarter
students, good teachers are all placed in the “smart students teaching”
education. In other words, less smart students would have to study with less
prestigious teachers.
I think the irony exists here. If the
purpose of separating students based on their talents is to accelerate talented
students and help boost less smart ones’ potential, they should both receive
high-quality education. Just leaving unselected students ignorantly does not
change the quality of education, quality of the whole students in the future,
and the quality and level of our society in long term.
In order to achieve the goal of “prestigious
education,” we should provide the quality of education equally among students.
I do not mean that we should not separate the students based on levels. We have
to provide high quality of education to each group of students that best suits
each level of talents. Smarter ones would be smarter, and less smart ones will
get the opportunity to sow and boost their gifted potential one day.
This is how we can realistically accomplish
“equal education” in our society.
It's a lot to assume that providing better education for those kids who will really make use of it will somehow lower the standard for the vast majority, and it's also a lot to assume that the best teachers are always working in the best schools. Look at KMLA - I can say of myself that I'm not the best teacher, and really - is a "good teacher" really needed as standard for good education? It definitely helps, but I like to think a great student will overcome everything if she or he REALLY wants to learn, but then again, a lot of great students don't know they are great or have time to be great (Carlos might be an example). Anyways interesting opinion.
답글삭제